Note to Sir Nick: Does DeChambeau really need to improve his Wedge game?

I especially enjoyed the final round of the Rocket Mortgage Classic watching the battle of the two BIG Ballers.  As always, I was interested in Sir Nick’s commentary about the weakness in Mr. DeChambeau’s game – his wedges – and Sir Nick’s suggestion that he should invest in an equipment change to tighten up this weakness.

I was all in, not only as a big fan of Sir Nick and Jim Nance, but Bryson’s 6-iron length wedges have always looked very awkward to me.  On Monday after the tournament, I received several calls from instructor clients/friends asking if I could support Sir Nick’s analysis.  Never one to back down from a challenge I agreed to take a deep dive into the difference between Bryson’s game – and specifically changes from 2019 to so far in 2020. 

WEDGE PLAY:  4 or 5 years ago I had my genius programmer create a special query for me to demonstrate exactly how proficient Zach Johnson’s wedge game was and is.  It enables me to look at almost everything, but the two most important attributes I found are % Greens Hit and Average Down-in Score.


You can see below that Bryson hit 78% of his targets in 2019 and improved to 86% this year.  In other words, he improved his missed greens from 1 in every 5 attempts to 1 every 7.  At an average of 3 of these shots per round, he misses less than 1 green every 2 rounds.


This is his average score for all attempts.  Think of each wedge opportunity as an easy Par 3.  Bryson improved his scoring average by .16 strokes.  If we do the math on his Down-In improvement, it is .16/shots, times 114 shots in 2020 = 18 Strokes saved this year.  In my studies of the value of a stroke on Tour, at Bryson’s current TOP-10 level, each stroke is worth $50-70,000.  Let’s call it $60,000 x 18.  It amounts to a cool MILLION in his Wedge play alone.  I tip my hat to him!

In my next post, I will discuss the dramatic change in Bryson’s Driving – is it all good or does distance have its perils?

What is the Golf SeeSaw and how does it apply to your game?

“What’s the most important stat in golf?” As a golf statistician, I’m asked this question more than almost any other. To answer it, I explain that there isn’t one – and if there were, I’d have no reason to be in business.  We are all snowflakes.  We have our own strengths and weaknesses and find our own special way to reach our number. That being said, the question is still an important one that deserves further study.

Research into my company’s ( database of almost 400,000 golf rounds reveals that the game is an important balance of five different facets.  In my 30+ years of analyzing the game, I have yet to see a player that performed at the same handicap level across all five facets.  We are ALL balancing the number of good shots/good results against the frequency and severity of our errors.

I refer to this as Golf’s SeeSaw Effect.

SeeSaw graphic 060420

The secret to scoring at every level is much more than the ability to hit good shots. It’s also the skill to manage one’s game and limit the frequency and severity of bad shots or errors.

When I started my company 30+ years ago, I discovered that one of the major deficiencies in golf statistics was that they did not address the negatives in the game. Even today, the PGA Tour produces 650+ stats on each player and only ONE of them addresses a negative:  3-Putt Avoidance.  In fact, when I search the Tour’s ShotLink stats for “Penalty,” I get the surprising answer (in blue) below.

Screen Shot Tour defn Penalty

Could this be because penalties do not happen on Tour?  Believe me, they do!

The significant role that errors play in our games led me to make sure that I captured them in  As you can see by the graphic above, the seesaw effect is that the more good shots/results on the left match up with the fewer errors on the right, the lower one’s handicap will be.

Good Shots/Results Defined

  • Greens Hit in Regulation (GIR’s).
  • Chip/Pitch shots hit to within 5 feet of the hole (Chip/Pitch = shots from within 50 yards of the hole).
  • Sand shots hit to within 8 feet of the hole (Sand = shots from sand within 50 yards of the hole).
  • 1-Putts from 4–20 feet and greater.

Errors Defined

  • Tee or Approach shots hit out of play (requiring an advancement, or resulting in a penalty).
  • Chip/Pitch shots that miss the green AND require 4 or more strokes to hole out.
  • Sand Shots that miss the green AND require 4 or more shots to hole out.
  • 3-Putts from 30 feet and closer.

The seesaw graphic above is telling us the following about the zero handicap golfer:

Good Shots/Results = 21 (on average per round & rounded to whole numbers)

  • GIR’s: 12
  • Chip/Pitch shots to 5 feet:  4
  • Sand shots to 8 feet:  1
  • 1-Putts from 4-10 feet:  4

Errors = 1 (on average per round & rounded to 1 decimal)

  • Tee & Appr. shots hit out of play or penalties:  0.9
  • Chip/Pitch shots : 0.1
  • Sand Shots: 0.1
  • 3-Putts from 30 feet or closer:  0.3

[Note: How can a golfer make a Chip/Pitch error 0.1 times per round? Easy. The zero handicap golfer will make one of these errors on average every 10 rounds.]

Record these simple stats on a separate scorecard for the next 3-5 rounds to see where you fall on Golf’s SeeSaw.  This exercise will reveal the true strengths and weaknesses of your game.

For a Complete Strokes Gained analysis of your game, login to

How Solid is Your Pre-Shot Routine and Why Do You Need One?

Weather is improving and now’s the time when most golfers are excited about a new season.  Unfortunately, we’ve been bounced back into a disturbing offseason mode.  The early tour events that fuel our enthusiasm and heighten our anticipation are GONE. No TPC Sawgrass! The MASTERS postponed indefinitely!  What’s next, our courses closing down?  Unfortunately, YES!

What can we be doing at home to help us come out on the other side of this unwelcome hiatus as better players?  Well, here’s something that I hear far too little about from fellow golfers as well as my client instructors – Developing a Solid Pre-Shot Routine.

Years ago, I had the pleasure of spending a few days at the Kohler resort in the excellent company of Ian Baker-Finch.  It was a once in a lifetime experience to spend time on and off the course with a great player that happens to be an even nicer man.  One night at dinner Ian spoke about his British Open win and how he handled the tremendous pressure of the final back 9 with a slim lead.  He dealt with it by relying totally on his routine.  I remember vividly how he went into a mini trance recalling exactly what he did as he approached every shot, right down to the “…Ok set, one waggle and GO!” almost knocking over a glass of wine.  We should all learn from this and practice our routines whenever we practice – it’s that important.

What do I mean by Pre-Shot Routine?
There are two important processes we should go through before hitting the ball – Planning and Execution. First, plan the shot.  Start by selecting the right club and shot to make it happen. This can involve discussion with a caddie and/or a playing partner.  Please do as much of this as possible before it is officially your turn. These decisions made, stand behind the ball, look at your target and visualize the desired shot and outcome.  Finally, move into address position, and promptly execute the shot.  This is where the cameras are rolling.  Think of that step forward into the address position as entering an Isolation Bubble.  Once in the bubble, no second thoughts or doubts or distractions should be allowed to intrude.  To be clear, this is the part that I consider to be the critical Pre-shot routine.

Over the years I have put a stopwatch on the winners of majors as they face the ultimate pressure of the final back 9.  When I put Tiger on the clock in the 2007 PGA, his time in the Bubble  was a speedy 10 seconds.  Phil’s routine was slightly longer – 17 seconds down the stretch in his last Masters win.  Lucas Glover won the US Open with a 16 second routine.  I timed Patrick Reed’s putting routine in his 2018 Masters win and wrote about it in GolfWRX:  A routine to copy:  Patrick Reed’s 9-second putting routine at The Masters.  My point is that the best in the world work long and hard to develop their protective routines in their bubbles.  At the same time, the importance of a solid, pre-shot routine seems to be lost on most amateur golfers.

How can you use this?

  • Develop your own pre-shot routine and divide it into the two segments discussed above: Planning and Execution.
  • Have a friend time you in the “bubble” – the moment you step forward and begin to address the ball until your club makes contact with the ball. If you’re in it longer than 20 seconds you are not only wasting time, you are leaving too much of an opening for doubt and confusion to seep in.
  • I see many amateurs that take two and three practice swings before every shot.  There should be a legal limit of ONE.
  • Discipline yourself to utilize your pre-shot routine whenever you practice. Make it an automatic part of each shot and the same every time both on the course and in the practice area.  A solid routine is the best defense against the pressure of competition.

For a Complete Analysis of Your Game, log on to:

How Important are Fairways?

One of my college coaches asked me to provide perspective for his players on the importance of hitting fairways.  I love when my clients do that – it’s a compliment!  In this age of “bomb and gouge” players tend to focus on distance at all costs – and there are costs.  To help quantify this I ran a query on the 2019 PGA Tour ShotLink data – 14,090 rounds to be exact – quite a solid sample.  I looked into how players score from the fairway vs. rough as well as relative accuracy from various distances from each.  To be clear, I isolated only primary rough locations labeled by the Tour as “Rough.” 


The cost or scoring difference between hitting the fairway vs. rough is .275 strokes:

      • Results from the fairway = -.180 (under par)
      • Results from the rough = +.095 (over par)

This means that a golfer who misses half the fairways (7) in a given round loses just under 2 shots to par – not counting Penalty or No Shot driving results that we consider to be errors.


The effect on accuracy is even more dramatic than that on score.  Bottom line, in order to be as accurate from the rough as from the fairway at 151 to 175 yards, a Tour player must be as much as 75 yards closer to the target.    

Tour.Appr fwy v rgh

Accuracy from 151 to 175 yards:  

      • Hit Green from Fairway: 72%; Hit Green from Rough: 47%
      • Average Proximity to Hole from Fairway: 23 feet; from Rough: 29 feet

To attain the same the fairway accuracy cited above from the rough, we need to get to the 76 to 100-yard range:

      • Hit Green from Rough: 71%
      • Average Proximity to Hole: 20 feet

Midpoint to midpoint of these ranges is 75 yards.

One might ask, how does this relate to amateur golfers?  For the answer to this I looked into our database and was not totally surprised that the answer is not so much.  Why?  Because amateurs are not nearly as accurate from any position – and certainly not from greater distances.  Thus, accuracy can only fall off so much with shots from the rough.  [See chart below: the average 15-19 Handicap golfer hits the same percentage of greens from the rough by only moving 25 yards closer to the hole.  I use the 151-175 yard range as it represents the greatest number of Approach opportunities at virtually every handicap level for golfers playing the correct tees for their skill level.

15-19 Fwy v Rough

Bottom line, our analysis reveals that as one moves up the handicap ranges, they need to focus far more on avoiding errors off the tee than simply hitting fairways.  

For a complete Strokes Gained Analysis of your game, log on to:

What really separates your BEST and WORST rounds?

Do you wonder what changes the most when you’re playing your best vs. the rounds you’d like to forget?  I’ve been providing this perspective to pro tour players for years, but golfers at every level can benefit from this information.  The good news is that it’s readily available on  Here are the steps to running what I call a BEST vs. WORST analysis, or specifically the Best vs. Worst of your most recent 20 rounds.

Under Analyze, use the Filter Rounds tab:

1.  Run an analysis of the Most Recent 20 rounds.  It can be more or less rounds and can also be further filtered by type and format (e.g., Tournament, Stroke play… and even by Course).

2.  From the Rounds/Scoring page of the analysis, record:

    a.  Average score

   b.  Date of the oldest round analyzed (this will be the anchor date for your BEST and WORST analysis).

3.  BEST – Select:  Score Less than or Equal to:   The average score (2. a. above) AND anchor the analysis on the Start Date (2. b. above).  This will produce the BEST analysis.  If it is not exactly 10 rounds (or half of whatever # of rounds you’re using), simply adjust the score selected up or down by 1.  Record the Strokes Gained for each facet as I have done in the chart below.

4.  WORST – Select:  Score Greater than or Equal to:  One stroke above the score used in the BEST analysis above.  Again, anchor the analysis with the Start Date.  Record the Strokes Gained for each facet as I have done in the chart below.

5.  Calculate the difference between the Strokes Gained for each facet to determine the greatest differences.  You can then re-run the analysis to determine exactly what is causing the differences.

Screen Shot 2020-02-20 at 3.07.42 PM.png

The case above is an actual study that I did for a player.  Putting came as a surprise as it had long been one of his strengths.  When we looked closer, we found a fairly dramatic drop in his 1-Putt success in the critical ranges 4 to 10 feet while at the same time his 3-Putts nearly doubled. Clearly good to know, and the information he needed to see where there was work to be done!

Putting: Two important but different skills

Putting is 40% of the game at virtually every handicap level.  The higher the scoring level, the more putts are needed but the ratio of # Putts/Score holds steady – that is, up until the 20+ handicaps.  At this level the pickup holes with no putts recorded slightly lower the percentage.

So what are the two skills?

1.  Short putts:  Line and accuracy are crucial inside 10 feet.  Practicing a solid setup and alignment routine will help ensure consistent accuracy.

2.  Distance control:  In longer, lag putts, the most important skill to develop is feel because distance is more important than line.

How much to practice each skill

A study of putting distances faced by the average golfer (15-19 handicap) reveals that practice time should be split 80% short putts 20% distance control.  That’s because 83% of total putts during an average round occur inside 10 feet (this is all putts:  1st, 2nd and 3rd …).  When looking at just first-putt opportunities outside 10 feet, 88% fall between 11 and 40 feet; only 12% at 41+ feet.  

To practice your distance control, I recommend spending time gaining confidence in your 30-foot lag.  You can then make all other lag putts a function of that stroke.  It is very important when playing away from home to set up 30 foot tees and putt back and forth (I use two balls) until that distance becomes almost automatic.  When you hit the first green, you will be ready to stroke the first putt with confidence.

Work with your instructor on the specific practice drills for each skill, but your goals should be:

Short putts:  Increase your 50% Make distance – the distance from which you hole 50% of your putts.  See where you are on the graph below.

A screenshot of a cell phone

Description automatically generated

Distance control:  Work to expand your 2.00 Putt distance – the distance from which you two-Putt the vast majority, but one and three-putt with the same frequency on the rest.  Again, see where you fit on the graph below and work to extend your 2.00 distance.

A screenshot of a cell phone

Description automatically generated

You will need a way of accurately recording and analyzing your putting distances.  I recommend  Self-serving?  Perhaps, but it’s the only place I know where you can easily and accurately get the information you need to determine your exact strengths and weaknesses, and why.  

Determining your putting distances? I recommend that you build this into your pre-shot, putting routine.  When you reach the green, you need to mark your ball and walk to the flag.  Simply count your steps.  For the longer putts, get to the midpoint – check the break – and count your steps back to your ball.  Then double the number.  Finally, know the distance of your average stride – heel to heel.  I am 6’ 1” and my average, walking stride is 28 inches.  I have to stride out a bit to average 3 feet, something that I actually practiced in my living room until it became automatic.

For a complete Strokes Gained Analysis of your game, go to

Follow us on Social Media!

A Website.

Up ↑