Here we are examining how to save half a shot in a very small part of the game—just 2 and 1.6 shots per round respectively for Mr. 18 and Mr. 9. The sand game is an underrated skill that produces more errors per attempt than any other part of the game. When I was learning the game, I was afraid of the gaping bunkers surrounding ALL of our 18 greens. I worked hard to gain confidence from the sand that made the greens seem larger and easier to hit.
As always, if you work to avoid errors you’ll solve this portion of the puzzle. Mr. 18 saves 12% of his sand opportunities (with 27% errors) vs. 21% saves for Mr. 9 (only 15% errors).
For a complete Strokes Gained analysis of your game, log on to: ShotByShot.com
How can we save two strokes in this less frequently used part of the game (ten shots per round for Mr. 18 vs. eight shots for Mr. 9). As always, please start with avoiding errors. In the short game, these are shots that miss the green AND require four or more strokes to hole out. My pro and mentor spent hours on the short game with me. First, valuable technique instruction. Then competitions @ $1 per shot—best lessons ever! His method was to break the short game shot opportunities into three categories, and this goes for the Sand game as well. Try it—it works.
Green light: Good lie/position, no trouble–try to hole it.
Yellow light: Difficult but doable–play conservatively and try to be left with an uphill, makable putt.
Red light: Very difficult with looming downside–just get the ball on the green and avoid the error.
Next, practice the type of shots that you face the most and especially those that tend to give you problems. Bottom line, hit more shots closer to the hole and avoid costly errors. While this sounds like annoyingly obvious advice, maybe it will help to consider that Mr. 18 saves only 21% of these opportunities vs. 32% for Mr. 9.
For a complete Strokes Gained analysis of your game, log on to: ShotByShot.com
Once you have descended the ladder thru the 100’s and conquered the 90’s, you need to strive for golf’s holy grail – breaking 80! It’s not easy but well worth the effort. As I was told by my first pro and mentor, “the game really does get more fun the better you play“. And spot on he was. I worked hard and eventually attained my ultimate goal of having my handicap match my personality – zero. It was so much fun that I created a new and better system of golf stats and analysis, now known as Strokes Gained. You can read about the History of Strokes Gained on my website: www.ShotByShot.com
I quickly discovered that the game is a puzzle in that all of the pieces, good and bad, fit together to produce a score. Each round is a mix of good shots, average shots and bad shots/errors. The challenge is to find which piece of your puzzle is your greatest weakness so you can target your improvement efforts on the highest impact area. If you track the simple good and bad outcomes listed below for a few rounds, your strengths and weaknesses will become apparent.
Here is my blueprint for breaking 80
Distance: I will ignore this and assume you are playing from the appropriate tees for your game.
Fairways: Hitting them is important, as we are all more accurate from the short grass.
Errors: Far more important than Fairways Hit is the FREQUENCY and SEVERITY of bad misses. ShotByShot.com users record THREE types of Driving Errors:
No Shot: You have missed in a place from which you do not have a normal next shot, requiring some sort of advancement to get the ball back into normal play. This tends to be the less costly error – usually 70% of a stroke.
Penalty: A one-stroke penalty due to a penalty area or an unplayable lie.
Lost/OB: Stroke and distance penalty.
GIR’s: The most useful of all of the “old school” stats for two reasons. First, your long game has been efficient enough to get you to the green in regulation (2 strokes or more under par). Second, it is always a birdie or eagle putt of some length.
Errors: In the Approach facet, this is a penalty result or a shot missed so badly that you are faced with a 2nd shot from greater than 50 yards of the hole.
Short Game Shots (shots from within 50 yards of the hole): If you miss NINE greens, you should have at least EIGHT green-side save opportunities.
*Errors: Shots that miss the green AND require FOUR or more total shots to hole out. In my book, the fringe does not count as a green missed.
You should have one or two sand shots per round, depending on your course.
You need 33 putts or less and the numbers above will ensure that you get there.
GOOD LUCK! Please let me know when you are successful.
Here we need to save 3 strokes. This facet involves the greatest number of long game opportunities – on average 17.6 full swing attempts per round. These attempts are generally split 70% from the fairway and 30% from the rough. Let’s ignore the sand for now as it accounts for approximately only 1 shot every three-plus rounds. Except to say that when you find yourself in a fairway bunker, it is usually a mistake, so take your medicine, get back in play and avoid doubling the pain.
Where to save three strokes? Avoid penalties and that’s at least one stroke. Then hit three more greens in regulation and your there – Mr. 18 averages five GIR’s vs. Mr. 9’s eight. Obviously, the key is to improve accuracy.
I recommend working on the distance ranges circled in the charts below and devoting 70% of your work to fairway shots. From distances longer than the circled ranges, make smart choices, play within your capabilities and avoid errors and penalties. Easy?! At either handicap level, from long-range you will miss more greens that you hit. Knowing this, work toward “good misses” – the fat side of the green, short but in the fairway, etc. Finally, my data supports that hitting the green is far more important than worrying about “proximity to the hole”. But that’s another article.
I admit that Bryson is growing on me. His demeanor seems more joyful and he is playing a bit faster. You have to admire the dedication to his craft, his skill and prodigious, yet accurate, long game. That said, I was rooting for Lee Westwood, once it was clear that Zach Johnson was not going to don Arnie’s famous sweater.
Let’s ignore the first three rounds and jump straight to the final head-to-head between Bryson and Lee Westwood. Bottom line, in the 4th round, Westwood’s accuracy with his approach shots offset Bryson’s driving distance and accuracy. Neither of them made any long game mistakes. Lee’s short game bested Bryson by just over a stoke – enhanced by a 19-foot putt from the fringe (considered short game, not putting, in tour stats).
The true separation between the two came on the greens. Lee gave up 3.44 Strokes Gained to Bryson on the greens in the 4th round alone. Part of it was a single 3-Putt by Lee from 46 feet – by no means a choke on those firm, windswept greens – but Bryson had no 3-Putts.
The major difference was in the 1-Putts made versus those missed. Even Paul Azinger cringed along with the rest of us as Westwood missed FIVE consecutive putts from 19′, 9′, 8′ (for par), 13′ and 9′ in the first five holes of the round. A player tied for the lead in a premier event needs to make at least two of these putts. I did not see it, but believe that Lee’s fiancee/caddie must have walked off the 5th hole with her head a bit down. Below, are the 1-Putt numbers by distance for DeChambeau and Westwood for the 4th round.
The 6 to 10-foot range is the 50% make distance on the PGA Tour. As I have said for years, this important range separates the good putters on Tour from the rest while the 11 – 20 foot range usually separates the winners. In the final round, the winner tends to beat that 50% average from 6 to 10 feet. Had Lee made 3 of 5 (60%), he would have put himself in the cat-bird seat.
Skill in this critical facet of the game is measured by distance and accuracy. But let’s take distance out of the equation by assuming we’re all playing the correct tees for our games and focus on ACCURACY.
As the chart in my first post indicates, we are looking for 2.5 strokes on, what for a typical golf course, is 14 driving holes. The chart below shows results in the average round for Mr. 18 and Mr. 9. Note that Mr. 18 makes two Driving Errors* per round while Mr. 9 just over one. Weed out these costly errors and you can be more than half way home, especially if they are Penalty Errors** that tend to carry a cost of between 1.3 strokes (penalty with drop) and two-plus strokes (stroke and distance). This may be easier said than done, but sometimes the fix is as simple as target and club selection from the tee. Sure, it works to aim away from trouble but try also choosing a club that cannot reach the trouble. Most holes that feature trouble off the tee will also be stroke holes, even for Mr. 9. Avoid the error and take double-bogey out of play. This is also a valuable strategy for match play situations.
Next, strive to hit at least one more fairway. the approach accuracy charts in my next post will illustrate how many more greens are hit from the fairway vs. the rough.
*No Shot Driving Errors = Balls hit out of play that require an advancement shot to return to normal play.
**Penalty Errors = a. Stroke with a drop, or b. Stroke and distance
You might ask: How do I know the differences between these handicap levels?Well, it is my full-time job to know about the numbers behind the game of golf—at all levels. I have been a student of the game from a statistical standpoint for 30-plus years. I created the strokes gained analysis website, ShotByShot.com, used by thousands of amateur golfers to improve by isolating the strengths and weaknesses of their games. Additionally, I work with PGA Tour players to extract clear answers from the Tour’s overwhelming 650-plus ShotLink stats.
I’ve learned that there is no such thing as an “average” game, no matter the handicap level. We’re all snowflakes and find our own unique way to shoot our number. With that said, ShotByShot.com’s 450,000-plus round database enables us to create a composite of the average golfer at each level. One of the beauties is that our data is robust and smooth across all five major facets so that any golfer’s strengths and weaknesses—and we all have them—stand out clearly by comparison.
The Data We Used
18 Handicap: I averaged the 5,000 rounds in our database that match the 18 Differential from Slope Adjusted Course Rating. In other words, the Best eight of 20 rounds when Mr. 18 actually played to an 18 handicap.
9 Handicap: Similarly, his Best eight out of 20 using the 5,000 applicable rounds in our database.
As you might guess, the scoring difference between these two handicap levels is nine strokes. So, if your snowflake matches or is close to Mr. 18’s, simply work to drop the shots below by facet and voila you are there.
The chart below shows the distribution of the strokes by facet that Mr. 18 needs to save to join Mr. 9. In the coming days, I will post five short articles – each describing the most important areas for improvement in each of the five major facets: Driving, Approach shots, Chip/Pitch, Sand shots and Putting. Next post Mr. 18 => 9: Driving.
Years ago, I was lucky enough to join a special golf club that had a well-earned reputation as the most difficult test in our area. Golf soon became my passion and I was pleased to invite friends and clients to experience the course that I loved. Before their 1st round, I would offer my guests a standard wager. I would have them choose a score 5 to 10 shots above their conceivable scoring max. I would bet $10 that they could not break that lofty number. For the extra cocky, I would also bet that they could not avoid at least one double bogey. How difficult is my course? In 30+ years, I have NEVER LOST either of those wagers.
Just imagine how Concession members could cash in on a wager like this! Not to mention the number of lost balls or sleeves of balls. I couldn’t help but think of the time it might take a foursome of average golfers to finish. Including out of bounds and/or balls hit out of play, Concession appeared to be just about the most challenging driving course EVER. The breaks in the healthy vegetation featured problematic water off the tee on NINE holes.
To bolster my point, I dug into exactly how the 71 top Tour players handled Concession. I had my genius program extract two important stats from the ShotLink data that do not appear in the Tour’s stats:
Driving Errors: Penalty results this week were more than twice the Tour’s 2020 season average. .40/round vs. .19/round for the 2020 season. This means that on average the best 71 players on Tour had 1.6 drives result in a penalty* situation during their 4 rounds at Concession while the entire field of the 2020 Tour would have had only .8 such driving errors every four rounds. *Penalty = OB, Lost or Penalty area requiring 1 stroke penalty and drop.
Short Game Errors**: These were also twice the Tour’s 2020 season average. 4.2% of shot attempts resulted in errors vs. 2.1% for the 2020 season. Below are the main Around the Green (Short Game Tour stats). NOTHING about these stats would lead me to believe that the FIELD had any such dramatic problems around the greens. If you watched, as I did, you understand my point.
**Short Game Error = Shot attempts from within 50 yards of the hole (Chip/Pitch or Sand). The shot MISSES the green AND requires 4 or more TOTAL strokes to hole out.
The answer is Rory McIlroy. He won the 2012 BMW Championship with a -.272 Strokes Gained Putting. It was the first leg of the playoffs, so a limited field of 72 players. But hey, this was the best 72 players for the year-to-date AND no CUT. To be honest, there might have been another negative winner that snuck past me, but I seriously doubt it. Please be sure to let me know (nicely) if you discover that I am wrong.
As we know, putting is key. In fact, it is approximately 40% of the game at every skill and scoring level (see chart below). Strokes Gained Putting was introduced on Tour in 1994. Since then, more often than not, Tour winners are highly ranked in this important facet – often #1 in the FIELD but usually in the TOP-10. As a statistician, I was shocked when I saw Rory’s negative Strokes Gained WIN. So, I filed it away.
How bad was Rory’s putting?
Rory won by two strokes over Phil Mickelson and Lee Westwood. His putting was ranked #45 @ -.272, giving up just over one stroke to the FIELD for the event. Most costly, Rory had TWO 3-Putts from 20 and 35 feet. These are reasonably close ranges by Tour standards. For Strokes Gained purposes, 35 feet is the Tour’s 2-Putt distance so that 3-Jack cost him one stroke while the 20 footer about 1.13 strokes.
How did he overcome his putting shortfall?
Simple, he was dominant against the FIELD in every other aspect of the game. Rory was ranked #1, or +2.58 in Approach the Green and #4, or +1.07Off the Tee. Most importantly, Rory was ranked #1, +3.81 in Tee to Green (this measures everything except Putting). To top it off, Rory chipped in TWICE. Those two strokes of genius alone offset his two measly 3-Putts. Well done, Rory!
Isn’t that the way all golfers think about it? I certainly do – and so must the eight players at the AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am who suffered 4-Putts. None more-so than Nate Lashley who left the 16th green on Sunday after a 4-Putt for triple-bogey. This dropped him from the lead to three strokes behind with only two holes left to recover. Devastating I’m sure! Not to pile on, but there are a few things that set Nate’s 4-Putt apart from the other seven at Pebble Beach:
His was the only 4-Putt in the final round.
His 13-footer 1st putt was the closest to the hole. There were two from 15 feet, two from 30 feet and the other three from 42, 47 and 53 feet.
13 feet was also the 3rd closest starting distance of the 54, 4-Putts recorded in the 2021 PGA Tour season so far. The closest was a painful 4 feet and 2nd place 12 feet.
His was the only 4-Putt by a player in the lead.
Just how rare, or frequent, are these embarrassing 4-Putts? My focus group of ONE, has always considered the 4-Putt to be a relative rarity. I only tend to play in a couple of Stroke Play events each year and throw in a few Stroke play qualifying rounds. The remainder of my 70 to 90 rounds per season are all match play where the unfortunate 3rd putt is almost always conceded and picked up. In short, I expect ONE 4-Putt max each season and am usually relieved when I can get it out of the way early and blame it on “winter rust.”
I have studied putting and distance control on the PGA Tour for many years and know fully well that 4-Putts are by no means that rare among the best in the world. To update my conclusion, I looked at the 14 events of the Tour’s 2021 season including last week’s AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am. Here is what I found:
# ShotLink Rounds: 4,906
6-Putts: 1 (and it was from 4 feet!!)
The average start distance of all 54 putts was 43.8 ft. The complete array of starting distances is in the chart below.
This amounts to a DREADED putting result once in every 91 PGA Tour rounds. In other words, just about every full-time Tour player has ONE each season.
Other points of interest:
The course matters.
Winged Foot (home of the 2020 US Open) had the most with TEN 4-Putts and ONE 6-Putt (again, from 4 feet. OUCH!).
Torrey Pines (South) was 2nd with nine 4-Putts.
Pebble Beach was 3rd with eight 4-Putts.
Five courses had ONE
None of the 14 courses had ZERO 4-Putts.
How do amateurs match up?
To answer this, I had my genius friend & programmer run a quick query on 2020 ShotByShot year. I expected the frequency to be similar to the Tour’s, if not lower, due to the vast majority of rounds being match play – again, the 3rd putt is generally conceded or picked up. I also believed that as the player handicaps go UP, so will the instance of Stroke Play rounds dramatically diminish. Not true!
ShotByShot subscribers recorded 53,309 rounds and incurred a 4-Putts or worse once in every 19 rounds. That is 4.7 times the frequency of the PGA Tour. My only conclusion is that not only are ShotByShot subscribers extremely loyal, they are also much MORE HONEST than the palookas that keep beating up on me every week.